Changes to Kyorugi rules: what coaches need to know
Once again, and on the recommendation of the International Olympic Committee, World Taekwondo (WT) is analyzing and testing a set of modifications to the sparring rules. These tests are not definitive: they are currently part of a technical evaluation process, and it will not be until the World Taekwondo General Assembly on October 23 in Wuxi, China, that a decision will be made on whether or not to approve them for the Olympic cycle leading up to Los Angeles 2028.
Once again, and on the recommendation of the International Olympic Committee, World Taekwondo (WT) is analyzing and testing a set of modifications to the sparring rules. These tests are not definitive: they are currently part of a technical evaluation process, and it will not be until the World Taekwondo General Assembly on October 23 in Wuxi, China, that a decision will be made on whether or not to approve them for the Olympic cycle leading up to Los Angeles 2028.
1. Scoring system: simplification and clarity
Current rules (in force since September 2024):
- 1 point: punch to the torso.
- 2 points: kick to the torso.
- 3 points: kick to the head.
- 4 points: spinning kick to the torso.
- 5 points: spinning kick to the head.
- 1 additional point for each warning given to the opponent.
Proposal under trial:
- Maintain 1 point for a punch to the torso (registered with electronic gloves).
- 2 points for a kick to the torso.
- 3 points for a kick to the head.
- Eliminate bonuses for spinning techniques.
Technical implications for coaches:
The format becomes more linear and easier to understand for athletes and spectators, but it requires a rethinking of strategy: there will no longer be additional incentives for spins, which may impact the match planning and the use of spectacular technical resources.
2. Use of Video Replay (IVR): reduction of interruptions
Current rules (2024):
- The coach may request a review for kicks to the head not scored by the electronic system.
- One appeal per match is allowed (depending on the tournament).
- The referee may also request a review in cases of clear hits to the head or gamjeon situations.
Proposal under trial:
- IVR would be restricted to gamjeon only.
- Reviews requested by the coach for kicks to the head are eliminated.
- Only the referee could request a review in very obvious cases.
Technical implications:
This will push competitors to ensure clear and solid contact. Coaches will have to adjust the mental preparation of athletes, as reliance on the IVR request card would no longer be a strategic resource.
3. Number of referees: reduction in the octagon
Current rules:
- One center referee and three judges, or in some cases one central referee and two corner judges.
Proposal under trial:
- Officially establish a fixed format of one center referee and two corner judges.
Technical implications:
Fewer referees mean a more agile system, but also greater reliance on technology to score points. For coaches and athletes, it will be crucial to perfect the effectiveness of strikes on the sensors.
4. Introduction of electronic gloves with sensors
Current rules:
- Fist points were validated by the judges, as the approved gloves did not yet have a mandatory sensor.
Proposal under trial:
- Use of electronic gloves (Daedo brand), capable of automatically scoring impacts and sending a clear signal to the referee.
Technical implications:
This represents a substantial change in the scoring of the fist, which until now depended on human perception. It is expected to increase the relevance of fist work in match, forcing coaches to give it more space in their planning.
What’s next
These tests are part of a global process that has already been tested in Kazakhstan and Germany and will soon be replicated in Russia. The final decision will be made in Wuxi, China, in October 2025, during the World Taekwondo Assembly, prior to the World Championships.
Nothing is confirmed: the modifications may still undergo adjustments or even be discarded. However, coaches must anticipate possible scenarios and begin to prepare their athletes for a match model that favors clarity in scoring, fluidity of actions, and a greater role for technology.
In conclusion: the changes being tested are not minor. They directly affect match strategy, technical preparation, and the athlete-coach relationship. Staying informed and beginning to adjust planning is key to not falling behind if these rules become official on the road to Los Angeles 2028.
About The Author
Descubre más desde MASTKD
Suscríbete y recibe las últimas entradas en tu correo electrónico.
